Art Conservation and its Curriculum as Relational Mystery

Authors

  • Nadine M. Kalin University of North Texas
  • Scott Peck Museum of Biblical Art / National Center for Jewish Art

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25071/1916-4467.40838

Keywords:

mystery, neo-materialism, curriculum, death meditation, art conservation, relational worldview

Abstract

Art conservation practices tend to adhere to Eurocentric reductionism and rationalism that have dominated Western sciences and education, negating subjectivity and experience as knowledge sources. Aoki called for mysterious and generative middles between planned and live(d) curriculum to be indwelled through meditation, expanding curriculum to include individual lifeworlds and relations. This study mobilizes Foucauldian death meditation to destabilize and further expand curriculum by indwelling on death in life from the mysterious middles between human art conservators and more-than-human art objects. Bringing together neo-materialist and Indigenous perspectives, we reconfigure current limits of art conservation to consider agency, intra-action and permeability of human and non-human lifedeath. In the care of artwork by conceptual artists Komar and Melamid—intentionally created to disintegrate—meditations of attending and mourning reach toward more response-able forms of art conservation practice and curriculum. We propose an art conservation curriculum of relational mystery using death meditation entangled with conundrums of art mourning to deepen students’ enchantment with unfathomable aspects of lifedeath, thereby invigorating teaching and conserving with mystery.

Author Biographies

Nadine M. Kalin, University of North Texas

Nadine M. Kalin is a professor in the Department of Art Education in the College of Visual Arts and Design at the University of North Texas. Her lines of inquiry encompass thinking with art as provocation for curricular and pedagogical reconfigurations of current limits, inciting alternative relationalities and sustainable futures.

Scott Peck, Museum of Biblical Art / National Center for Jewish Art

Scott Peck is an art historian, art educator and art conservator, with a PhD in Art Education. Having over 30 years of museum experience, he has curated over 200 museum exhibitions and worked with over 50 different museums internationally, written over 30 publications, and has been Adjunct Faculty and Doctoral Fellow at the University of North Texas. As an art conservator, he has cared for, restored and conserved over 2000 works of art. Dr. Peck currently serves as Executive Director of the Museum of Biblical Art, the Museum of Holocaust Art and the National Center for Jewish Art in Dallas, Texas.

References

Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimately lived curriculum: Toward a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 255-268. https://acurriculumjourney.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/aoki-1993-legitimating-lived-curriculum-towards-a-curricular-landscape-of-multiplicity.pdf

Aoki, T. T. (2005). Curriculum implementation as instrumental action and as situational praxis. In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 111-125). Peter Lang. (Original work published 1983)

Aoki, T. T. (2005). Locating living pedagogy in teacher research: Five metonymic moments (2003). In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 425-432). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Reprinted from Locating living pedagogy in teacher research: Five metonymic moments, Curriculum intertext: Place/language/pedagogy, 2003, pp. 1-10, by E. Hasebe-Ludt & W. Hurren, Eds., Peter Lang.)

Aoki, T. T. (2005). Spinning inspiriting images in the midst of planned and live(d) curricula (1996). In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 413-423). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Original work published 1996)

Aoki, T. T. (2005). Teaching as indwelling between two curriculum worlds (1986/1991). In W. F. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 159-165). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Original work published 1986)

Atleo (Umeek), E. R. (2004). Tsawalk: A Nuu-chah-nulth worldview. University of British Columbia Press.

Atleo (Umeek), E. R. (2011). Principles of Tsawalk: An Indigenous approach to a global crisis. University of British Columbia Press.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University.

Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 92, 56-86. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF:92.05.2017

Battiste, M., & Youngblood Henderson, J. (Sa'ke'j). (2021). Naturalizing Indigenous knowledge in Eurocentric education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.14288/cjne.v32i1.196482

Bennett, J. (2010a). Thing-power. In S. Whatmore & B. Braun (Eds.), Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life (pp. 35-62). University of Minnesota Press.

Bennett, J. (2010b). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University.

Bhabha, H. (1990). Third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 207-221). Lawrence & Wisehart.

Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

Bignall, S., & Rigney, D. (2019). Indigeneity, posthumanism and nomad thought: Transforming colonial ecologies. In R. Braidotti & S. Bignall (Eds.), Posthuman ecologies. Complexity and process after Deleuze (pp. 159-181). Rowman & Littlefield.

Boullart, K. (2009). Ontology, world views and authenticity. In E. Hermens & T. Fiske (Eds.), Art conservation and authenticities: Material, concept, context (pp. 246-251). Archetype Publications.

Braidotti, R. (2006). The ethics of becoming imperceptible. In C. Boundas (Ed.), Deleuze and philosophy (pp. 133-159). Edinburgh University Press.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.

Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity.

Braidotti, R. (2022a). Posthuman feminism. Polity.

Braidotti, R. (2022b). The virtual as affirmative praxis: A neo-materialist approach. Humanities, 11(62), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/h11030062

Braidotti, R., & Fuller, M. (Eds.) (2019). Transversal posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020128318

Braidotti, R., Jones, E., & Klumbyte, G. (2022). Introduction. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbyte (Eds.), More posthuman glossary (pp. 1-6). Bloomsbury.

Bunge, R. (1984). An American urphilosophie: An American philosophy, BP (before pragmatism). University Press of America.

Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of Indigenous education. Kivaki Press.

Cajete, G. A. (2005). American Indian epistemologies. New Directions for Student Services, 109, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.155

Cajete, G. A. (2010). Contemporary Indigenous education: A nature-centered American Indian philosophy for a 21st century world. Futures 42, 1126-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.013

Clemens, R. A. (2022a). ‘Languages are so like their boots’: Linguistic incompossibility in Flush. Comparative Critical Studies, 19(2), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2022.0445

Clemens, R. (2022b). Linguistic incompossibility. In R. Braidotti. & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 72-74). Bloomsbury.

Cohen, J. J. (2018). Ontological turn, the. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 304-306). Bloomsbury.

Daigle, C. (2022). Transjectivity. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbyte (Eds.), More posthuman glossary (pp. 149-151). Bloomsbury.

Davies, M. (2022). Ecolaw. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbyte (Eds.), More posthuman glossary (pp. 39-41). Bloomsbury.

Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (C. V. Boundas, Ed.; M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). The Athlone Press. (Original work published 1969)

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Capitalism and schizophrenia: A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (rev. ed.; H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

Deloria, V. (1999). Spirit and reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr., reader. Fulcrum.

Deloria, V. (2001). Traditional technology. In V. Deloria & D. Wildcat (Eds.), Power and place: Indian education in America (pp. 57-65). Fulcrum Resources.

Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1993)

Downey, A. M. (2020). Mourning our losses: Finding response(-ability) within COVID-19. Antistasis, 10(3), 1-4. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/antistasis/article/view/31439

Downey, A. M. (2022a). Pedagogies of attending and mourning: Posthumanism, death, and affirmative ethics. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 37(2), 18-31. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/971

Downey, A. M. (2022b). (Re)envisioning childhoods with Mi’kmaw literatures. Journal of Childhood Studies, 47(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs202219949

Foucault, M. (1982a). The hermeneutic of the subject. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 93-106). The New Press.

Foucault, M. (1982b). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 223-251). The New Press.

Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality. Vol. 3: The care of the self. Vintage.

Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981-1982 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Picador.

Foucault, M. (2013). Speech begins after death (R. Bononno, Trans.). University of Minnesota.

Foucault, M. (2017). Subjectivity and truth: Lectures at the Collège de France 1980-1981 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Picador.

France-Lanord, A. (1996). Knowing how to question the object before restoring it. In S. P. Price, M. K. Talley, & A. M. Vaccaro (Eds.), Readings in conservation: Historical and philosophical issues in the conservation of historical heritage (pp. 244-247). The Getty Conservation Institute.

Garroutte, E. V., & Westcott, K. D. (2013). The story is a living being: Companionship with stories in Anishinaabeg studies. In J. Doerfler, N. J. Sinclair, & H. K. Stark (Eds.), Centering Anishinaabeg studies: Understanding the world through stories (pp. 61-79). Michigan State University Press.

Hallowell, I. (2010). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and world view. In J. S. H. Brown & S. E. Gray (Eds.), Contributions to Ojibwe studies: Essays, 1934-1972 (pp. 535-568). University of Nebraska.

Ham, A. (2023, August 24). The quest for a crocodile dictionary. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/24/science/crocodile-dictionary-vocalizations.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20230828&instance_id=101316&nl=the-morning&regi_id=210530523&segment_id=143062&te=1&user_id=fd33806043b5fee7a2e85987c13cb45a

Haraway, D. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin® in multispecies response-ability. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40(1/2), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780-006

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Hermens, E., & Fiske, T. (Eds.). (2009). Art conservation and authenticities: Material, concept, context. Archetype Publications.

Hinton, P., Mehrabi, T., & Barla, J. (n.d.). New materialisms/new colonialisms [Informally published manuscript]. AAbo Akademi University, Finland. https://newmaterialism.eu/content/5-working-groups/2-working-group-2/position-papers/subgroup-position-paper-_-new-materialisms_new-colonialisms.pdf

jagodzinski, j. (Ed.). (2018). Interrogating the Anthropocene: Ecology, aesthetics, pedagogy, and the future in question. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Timmerman, N., & De Danann Sitka-Sage, M. (Eds.). (2018). Wild pedagogies: Touchstones for re-negotiating education and the environment in the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jones, A. & Hoskins, T.K. (2016). A mark on paper: The matter of Indigenous-settler history. In C.A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 75-92). Palgrave Macmillan.

Kim, E. A. (2021). Global citizenship education through curriculum-as-relations. Prospects, 51(1-3), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09554-w

Komar, V., & Melamid, A. (1990). Crucifixion altarpiece [Steel panel with pigments, acids and various corrosives]. In S. Peck (Curator), The deconstruction of religion [Art exhibit, 2012]. Museum of Biblical Art and National Center for Jewish Art, Dallas, TX. https://www.biblicalarts.org

Komar, V., & Melamid, A. (1991). Paintings for the Holy Rosary Church. Ronald Feldman Gallery. https://feldmangallery.com/exhibition/145-paintings-for-the-holy-rosary-church-k-m-1-12-2-16-1991

Luther, H. M., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (Eds.). (1988b). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts.

Lykke, N. (2021). Vibrant death: A posthuman phenomenology of mourning. Bloomsbury.

Lykke, N. (2022). Vibrant death. In R. Braidotti, E. Jones, & G. Klumbyte (Eds.), More posthuman glossary (pp. 155-156). Bloomsbury.

Marker, M. (2019). Indigenous knowledges, universities, and alluvial zones of paradigm change. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(4), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1393398

Muños-Viñas, S. (2004). Contemporary theory of conservation. Routledge.

Narkiss, I. (2009). ‘Is it real?’ Authenticity, conservation and the visitor experience. In E. Hermens, & T. Fiske (Eds.), Art conservation and authenticities: Material, concept, context (pp. 237-245). Archetype Publications.

Nellis, R. (2018). Old mournings, new days. In E. Hasebe-Ludt & C. Leggo (Eds.), Canadian curriculum studies: A métissage of inspiration/imagination/interconnection (p. 55). Canadian Scholars Press.

Ng-A-Fook, N. (2009). Toward understanding a curriculum of being inhabited by the language of the other. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.14288/tci.v6i2.32

Paulsen, M., jagodzinski, j., & Hawke, S. M. (Eds.). (2022). Pedagogy in the Anthropocene: Re-wilding education for a new earth. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pinar, W. (1992). Cries and whispers. In W. Pinar & W. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 92-101). Teachers College Press.

Pinar, W. F., & Irwin, R. I. (Eds.). (2005). Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki. Routledge.

Powell, B. (2016). Collection care: An illustrated handbook for the care and handling of cultural objects. Rowan & Littlefield.

Pratt, S. L., & Rosiek, J. L. (2023). The logic of posthuman inquiry: Affirmative politics, validity, and futurities. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(8-9), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231162075

Restoule, J.-P., & Chaw-win-is. (2017). Old ways are the new way forward: How Indigenous pedagogy can benefit everyone. In the Canadian Commission for UNESCO’s IdeaLab. https://gcedclearinghouse.org/node/89009?language=en

Rosiek, J. L., Synder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135

Schrödinger, E. (1935). Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31(4), 555-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554

Sidebottom, K. (2021). Rhizomes, assemblages and nomad war machines—Re-imagining curriculum development for posthuman times. [Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University EPrints. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/160080

Skiveren, T. (2021). New materialism’s second phase. Criticism, 63(3), 309-312. https://dx.doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.3.0309

Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. Routledge.

Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. cultural geographies, 21(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067

Szczepanowska, H. M. (2013). Conservation of cultural heritage: Key principles and approaches. Routledge.

Taylor, C. (2023). New materialisms. The Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory, 31(1), 152-173. https://doi.org/10.1093/ywcct/mbad009

Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050

Todd, Z. (2015). Indigenizing the Anthropocene. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies (pp. 241-254). Open Humanities Press.

Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124

Tuck, E., & Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. A. (2013). Curriculum, replacement, and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(1), 72-89. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/411

Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1-40. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630

van der Tuin, I. (2018). Neo/new materialism. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 277-279). Bloomsbury Academic.

Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 2(1), 20-34. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/19145/16234

Youngblood Henderson, J. (Sa'ke'j). (2016). L’nu humanities. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Visioning a Mi’kmaw humanities: Indigenizing the academy (pp. 29-55). Cape Breton University Press.

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Kalin, N. M., & Peck, S. (2025). Art Conservation and its Curriculum as Relational Mystery. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.25071/1916-4467.40838